On the first dispute settlement mechanism after the WTO resumed face-to-face work， Japan and South Korea began to dispute over the establishment of a dispute settlement agency expert group for Japan's trade restriction measures to South Korea.The first finance and economics reporter learned from authoritative sources that， on the 29th， South Korea singled out the request for the establishment of the expert group of the above-mentioned disputes for the first time， and made a judgment on Japan's supplementary export promise request and revised policy and procedure in respect of fluorinated polyimide， corrosion inhibitor polymer and hydrogen fluoride， as well as the related technologies exported to South Korea. In this regard， the Japanese side said at the meeting that although South Korea has been working hard to resolve the matter through dialogue， it is still dead hearted to South Korea's request， and it is quite different to set up an expert group. At the meeting， the US side spoke strangely. A Geneva trade official disclosed to the first finance and economics reporter that the measures taken by Japan were based on calm consideration of the country， but the matter was not applicable to the WTO ruling. The United States urges both sides to solve this problem outside the WTO. If not， it should seek the assistance of other WTO members who have the belief in the general affairs of the WTO or that both sides concerned can match the solution.
The appeal body of
was suspended， and South Korea still insisted on taking legal action At the moment of the suspension of the appellate body， South Korea is still pursuing the establishment of a dispute expert group in the WTO on Japan's measures to export products and technologies to South Korea (hereinafter referred to as \ The South Korean side picked out the fastest drawing live record of the Liuhe treasure map in Hong Kong on the 29th. The products limited by Japan's export to Japan are mainly used for the production of semiconductors， smart phones and TV screens. The Liuhe treasure map of Hong Kong is the main component of high-tech industry These revised policies and procedures have led to the addition of cost and uncertainty by Korean Importers. The records of Hong Kong's fastest drawing show are totally different from those of Japan's WTO.[0} South Korea pointed out that the site record of the fastest drawing of the Liuhe treasure map in Hong Kong was discussed with the two sides in October and November 2019 by WTO， but it failed to reach a solution that could be approved by both sides. This effect also prompted South Korea to request the establishment of an expert group. Prior to this， relevant people from the Ministry of industry， commerce and resources of South Korea also pointed out that the trade restriction of Shitian in Japan mainly focused on semiconductors and performance devices. The main product of Liuhe treasure map in Hong Kong was Liuhe， which was closely related with Korea The on-the-spot record of the fastest drawing of the Liuhe treasure map in Hong Kong also adds great uncertainty to Korean enterprises. Of course， it is expected that South Korea's main industry can achieve self-improvement. However， the South Korean authorities' on-site record of the fastest drawing of the Liuhe treasure map in Hong Kong takes into account the factors that can be considered Field records， will also make preparations for the Liuhe treasure map， the fastest prize winning spot record in Hong Kong， and try to minimize the loss. The relevant person pointed out that the South Korean side needs to add equipment and develop new technologies， which is the tendency of South Korea to work hard. At the same time， it needs to supplement research and development expenses， and enterprises need to find a new supply and answer chain. Under such a general situation， Korean Enterprises and authorities have to bear the cost. Now it is such a situation. The Japanese side pointed out at the meeting that the above export requests all involve products for military purposes， and (Japan's measures) are not disguised trade restrictions with political motives. Japan once again reiterated that article 21 of the general agreement on Tariffs and trade (GATT) fully recognizes the rights of WTO members in this respect. Article 21 of the GATT deals with the content of \ The Japanese side pointed out that if South Korea's complaint is successful， it will damage the right of WTO members to control the export of such dual-use products， and mainly threaten international peace and calm. The Japanese side indicated that because of these reasons，六合藏宝图香港最快开奖现场记录 it could not approve the prejudice of setting up the expert group.
The US side: go to other places to fight forDuring a series of WTO meetings held in the second half of 2019， when Japan and South Korea were not at peace on this issue， the meeting scene was light， and any other WTO member of other countries publicly issued foreign views on this issue. This time， the US side spoke directly in public. The reason given by the US side to let Japan and South Korea \ The dispute settlement mechanism under the WTO indicates that if a member chooses again， it will negotiate again. According to the relevant provisions of the WTO， although Japan has rejected the request of South Korea for the establishment of an expert group， that is， after being rejected by the first prosecution party， it will not approve the second refusal of the establishment of the expert group after the first prosecution selects the application again， unless all members reject the application on the contrary. Therefore， if Japan and South Korea do not refer to the US proposal， the expert group of the ds690 case will be set up automatically after the meeting of the dispute settlement mechanism held in July this year. However， it should be pointed out that although the expert group still exists， the appellate body has been suspended， and the prospect of the ds690 case is unclear. On July 4， 2019， the Japanese authorities took measures to restrict the export of one-sided semiconductor and organic light-emitting diode (OLED) materials from South Korea， changing the framework export promise object to individual export promise object. This means that Japan's LIGO limited the export of fluoropolyimide， photoresist and high-purity fluorination to South Korea， which are the central materials for panel， LCD and semiconductor products. The material inventory period of large wafer factories in South Korea is 1-2 months. After the review system is restored， Japanese material factories must apply for export if they want to export to South Korea. It shows that the review time is about three months. According to the Japanese data， Japan is in a monopoly position in the markets of fluorinated polyimides (90% of the global total) and hydrogen fluoride (70%). However， the Japanese authorities said that they would not take any measures against Japan's WTO arbitration. The article now stipulates that one party shall not arbitrarily limit the total amount of exports if it does not affect the size of the country. In September 2019， South Korea decided to lodge its first complaint against Japan in the WTO and asked for consultation under the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. After entering 2020， South Korea has repeatedly asked Japan to take an external stance on the abolition of export restrictions on South Korea， and set May 31 as the end date， but the Japanese side ignored it. On June 2， South Korea decided to restart the dispute settlement process. (source: first finance and Economics) ，